Claim: It's cultivation, not oppression

Details

The claim here is that animals are cultivated for use, not oppressed by animal agriculture

Problems with this argument

1. This is semantics

"Cultivation" just means that animals have been systematically exploited for a long time. Having done something for a long time doesn't actually change the ethical characteristics of an action. Hence, all of these arguments apply


Markdown - (copy 📋)
Rich Text
[Claim: It's cultivation, not oppression](http://www.carnist.cc/cultivation)